If you have a legal dispute with Udemy, this clause requires you to resolve it through private arbitration rather than a public court, and you cannot join other users in a class action lawsuit.
This analysis describes what Udemy's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause removes your right to sue Udemy in court or participate in group lawsuits, which can significantly limit your practical ability to seek compensation for smaller individual harms.
Users who experience issues with Udemy, such as unauthorized charges, content disputes, or account terminations, must pursue individual arbitration rather than joining other affected users in a class action, potentially making small-value claims economically impractical to pursue.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Monitoring
Udemy has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You and Udemy agree that any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof or the use of the Services will be settled by binding arbitration between you and Udemy, except that each party retains the right to bring an individual action in small claims court and the right to seek injunctive or other equitable relief in a court of competent jurisdiction to prevent the actual or threatened infringement, misappropriation or violation of a party's copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, patents, or other intellectual property rights. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU AND UDEMY ARE EACH WAIVING THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY OR TO PARTICIPATE AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS ACTION OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING.— Excerpt from Udemy's Udemy Terms of Use
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision implicates the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which generally supports enforcement of arbitration agreements in the US, as well as FTC Act Section 5 consumer protection standards. In the EU, Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair contract terms may render mandatory pre-dispute consumer arbitration clauses unenforceable. In California, additional consumer protection limitations under the CLRA and Consumer Legal Remedies Act may restrict enforceability of arbitration clauses in specific contexts. The CFPB has historically engaged with mandatory arbitration in financial services contexts, though its rulemaking authority here is contested. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The class action waiver combined with mandatory arbitration represents a significant structural limitation on consumer legal recourse. Courts in EU member states have frequently found such clauses in consumer contracts to be unfair terms under the Unfair Contract Terms Directive, meaning EU-based enforcement of this provision may be unreliable. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK consumers face the highest exposure to non-enforcement of this clause; it may be unenforceable against them under applicable consumer law. California residents have additional statutory protections that may affect enforceability in certain claim types. Illinois and New York users should also consider state-specific consumer contract protections. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise buyers incorporating Udemy services into employee training programs should assess whether this arbitration clause applies to their institutional agreement or only to individual consumer accounts. The clause as written applies broadly to all disputes arising from 'these Terms' and 'use of the Services,' which could extend to B2B contexts depending on contract structure. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should document whether the opt-out mechanism (30-day written notice) is operationally communicated to new users at onboarding. Organizations deploying Udemy for employee training may want to negotiate arbitration terms separately in enterprise agreements to preserve institutional dispute rights.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause removes your right to sue Udemy in court or participate in group lawsuits, which can significantly limit your practical ability to seek compensation for smaller individual harms.
Users who experience issues with Udemy, such as unauthorized charges, content disputes, or account terminations, must pursue individual arbitration rather than joining other affected users in a class action, potentially making small-value claims economically impractical to pursue.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 132 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Udemy.