Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
In the event of any conflict between these Terms of Use and information provided by Customer Service or other portions of our websites, these Terms of Use will control.
In the event any information posted on the Site from time to time conflicts with any provision of these Terms, the applicable provision of these Terms shall control.
Apple and Apple subsidiaries are third-party beneficiaries of these Terms, and upon your acceptance of these Terms, Apple will have the right...to enforce these Terms against you as a third-party beneficiary.
Monitoring
Uber has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"In the event of a conflict in the terms of any Third-Party Services and these Terms, these Terms shall control with respect to Uber and your agreements with Uber herein...Excerpt from Uber's Terms of Use
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “In the event of a conflict in the terms of any Third-Party Services and these Terms, these Terms shall control with respect to Uber and your agreements with Uber herein...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 296 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.