Provision record
Uber · Uber Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Courts Exclusively Resolve Class and Mass Waiver Disputes

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Uber and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The arbitrator will have exclusive authority to resolve any Dispute, except the state or federal courts of San Francisco, California have the authority to determine any Dispute about enforceability...

Anyscale

if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...

Kling AI

13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
only a court of competent jurisdiction, and not an arbitrator, shall have the exclusive authority to resolve any and all disputes concerning the Class Action Waiver and Mass Action Waiver...

Excerpt from Uber's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Uber Terms of Use
Entity
Uber
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 29, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006643, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-041393
Document ID
CA-D-000420
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006643)
af98319521b481859dd3bbe940378519ac761115b732ac042b5eca7c52d2cd6f
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 03:06 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006643, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007512, captured Oct. 14, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Uber
Document: Uber Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-041393
Version: CA-V-006643
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:24:06 UTC
SHA-256: af98319521b48185…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/uber/uber-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-041393/courts-exclusively-resolve-class-and-mass-waiver-disputes/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Uber's Courts Exclusively Resolve Class and Mass Waiver Disputes clause do?

The clause states: “only a court of competent jurisdiction, and not an arbitrator, shall have the exclusive authority to resolve any and all disputes concerning the Class Action Waiver and Mass Action Waiver...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Uber?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.