Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
you consent as part of these Terms to venue for such cases exclusively in these courts.
You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
Monitoring
Uber has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"any dispute, claim, lawsuit, or controversy arising out of or relating to incidents or accidents resulting in personal injury...shall be brought and tried exclusively in the state or federal courts in the judicial district...encompassing the county in which the incident or accident occurred...Excerpt from Uber's Terms of Use
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “any dispute, claim, lawsuit, or controversy arising out of or relating to incidents or accidents resulting in personal injury...shall be brought and tried exclusively in the state or federal courts in the judicial district...encompassing the county in which the incident or accident occurred...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.