This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
you consent as part of these Terms to venue for such cases exclusively in these courts.
You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.
California: If you are a resident of California, we will not share personal information we collect about you except to the extent permitted under California law.
Monitoring
Uber has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Any dispute, claim, lawsuit, or controversy arising out of or relating to incidents or accidents resulting in personal injury or death...shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which the incident or accident occurred.— Excerpt from Uber's Uber Terms of Use
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “Any dispute, claim, lawsuit, or controversy arising out of or relating to incidents or accidents resulting in personal injury or death...shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which the incident or accident occurred.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.