Provision record
Uber · Uber Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Non-Individual Claims Must Litigate in Court if Severed

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Uber and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The parties agree to sever and litigate in court any request for public injunctive relief after completing arbitration for the underlying claim and all other claims.

Target

either you or Target may bring or take an individual claim in or to a small claims court...you agree that you or Target may bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin infringement or other misuse of intellectual property rights...

Credit Karma

The arbitration proceedings, including any exchanged materials, shall be confidential and you and Credit Karma agree to use reasonable efforts to streamline the proceedings

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
to the extent that any claims must therefore proceed on a class, collective, consolidated, or representative basis, such claims must be litigated in a civil court of competent jurisdiction and not in arbitration...

Excerpt from Uber's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Uber Terms of Use
Entity
Uber
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 29, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006643, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-041397
Document ID
CA-D-000420
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006643)
af98319521b481859dd3bbe940378519ac761115b732ac042b5eca7c52d2cd6f
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 03:06 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006643, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007512, captured Oct. 14, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Uber
Document: Uber Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-041397
Version: CA-V-006643
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:24:06 UTC
SHA-256: af98319521b48185…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/uber/uber-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-041397/non-individual-claims-must-litigate-in-court-if-severed/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Uber's Non-Individual Claims Must Litigate in Court if Severed clause do?

The clause states: “to the extent that any claims must therefore proceed on a class, collective, consolidated, or representative basis, such claims must be litigated in a civil court of competent jurisdiction and not in arbitration...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Uber?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.