Twilio modified its Terms of Service on March 19, 2026, removing Brazil from its entity-specific contracting structure while adding Japan as a separate jurisdiction with its own Twilio entity. The agreement also revised the definition of Order Form to remove a clause permitting self-service online purchases, narrowed the scope of service modifications by stating Twilio will not 'materially decrease' overall functionality, and made formatting corrections to 'Third Party Services' terminology. The net effect is a restructuring of which Twilio legal entity customers contract with based on domicile, and a contractual commitment that service changes will preserve overall functionality.
The updated terms remove Brazil from the list of countries with a dedicated Twilio entity (CISA Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.) and instead classify Brazil users under the generic international category contracting with Twilio Inc. Japan is now designated as a separate jurisdiction with its own Twilio entity (Twilio Japan G.K.). These changes affect which legal entity Brazilian and Japanese customers have a contractual relationship with and may have implications for dispute resolution, data handling, and applicable law. Additionally, the terms now state that Twilio will not 'materially decrease the overall functionality' of Services, establishing a baseline protection against significant feature removal. Customers in Brazil should confirm their new counterparty entity; customers in Japan now have a Japan-specific contracting entity.
The removal of Brazil from the entity-specific contracting structure creates uncertainty about dispute jurisdiction, applicable law, and data handling for Brazilian customers. The addition of Japan as a separate jurisdiction establishes clearer contractual clarity for Japanese customers. The commitment to preserve functionality protects customers against unilateral removal of core service capabilities, though the definition of 'materially decrease' remains subject to dispute interpretation.
→ Brazil-based customers should contact Twilio to confirm their new legal counterparty entity, applicable dispute jurisdiction, and any changes to data location or processing terms.
→ Japan-based customers should confirm that the designation of Twilio Japan G.K. as their counterparty aligns with any existing contracts or regulatory requirements.
→ Brazil customers may be uncertain which Twilio entity is their counterparty for disputes, billing, and data processing obligations, potentially complicating contract management.
→ Disputes in Brazil may be subject to different venue, law, or enforcement mechanisms under the new Twilio Inc. assignment instead of the former CISA entity.
Brazil was removed as a distinct jurisdiction; Japan was added. Brazil customers now contract with Twilio Inc. instead of a local entity.
Twilio committed to not materially decreasing the overall functionality of Services, creating a baseline for service continuity.
Removed language permitting self-service online order placement; now refers only to ordering documents between parties.
This change record describes what was added, removed, or modified in the document. Analysis reflects what the updated agreement states or permits. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
When Twilio updates or changes its services, it must preserve the core features and functions customers rely on, and cannot remove or disable major capabilities.
Customers in Brazil have a different legal counterparty for their contract, which may affect dispute jurisdiction, tax treatment, and data handling obligations.
This change affects the legal entity assignment for customers in Brazil and Japan. Previously, Brazil had a dedicated Twilio entity (CISA Telecomunicaciones); it now falls under the international Twilio Inc. structure. Japan transitions from unspecified assignment to explicit Twilio Japan G.K. assignment. The practical impact depends on the legal implications of entity assignment in each jurisdiction (tax, liability, dispute jurisdiction, data location). The commitment to preserve overall functionality may engage consumer protection regimes requiring service reliability. Organizations with customers or operations in Brazil and Japan should verify whether the entity change affects their vendor contracts, DPAs, or regulatory compliance frameworks.
GDPR (if EU customers' data flows through Brazil or Japan entities), LPGD (Brazil's general data protection law, applicable to data processing in Brazil), APPI (Japan's Act on Protection of Personal Information, applicable to data processing in Japan), consumer protection statutes in each jurisdiction governing service continuity.
Full compliance analysis
Obligation analysis, escalation trigger, board language, and recommended action.
Monitor: regulatory citations + obligations. Compliance: full compliance memo.
ConductAtlas provides verified policy intelligence sourced directly from platform documents. All analysis is intended to support, not replace, legal and compliance review. Record CA-C-001886.
See the full side-by-side comparison of every sentence added, removed, and modified.
🔒 Full diff — MonitorTwilio added two new disclosures to its Privacy Notice on May 22, 2026. First, the policy now explicitly states that …
Twilio updated its privacy notice on May 19, 2026 to provide more explicit detail about its Data Privacy Framework (DPF) …
Twilio updated its Terms of Service on May 9, 2026, making substantial changes to dispute resolution procedures for Mexico-based customers …
Get alerted when this policy changes again — including what changed and why it matters.
Prefer a weekly summary instead?
Get the biggest policy changes across 320+ platforms every Sunday.