This analysis describes what T-Mobile's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution under the service agreement. By mandating arbitration as the dispute resolution forum, the clause determines which adjudicatory process applies to claims arising from the service relationship.
Users agree that disputes with T-Mobile proceed through binding arbitration rather than traditional court proceedings, except for matters eligible for small claims court. This provision modifies the forum and procedural rules applicable to potential service-related disputes.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Monitoring
T-Mobile has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"ANY DISPUTE YOU HAVE WITH T-MOBILE MUST BE RESOLVED THROUGH BINDING ARBITRATION OR IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT. YOU ARE WAIVING YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL OR TO HAVE A COURT RESOLVE ANY DISPUTE BETWEEN YOU AND T-MOBILE. EXCEPT FOR SMALL CLAIMS COURT CASES, ALL DISPUTES WILL BE RESOLVED BY BINDING ARBITRATION.— Excerpt from T-Mobile's T-Mobile Terms and Conditions
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution under the service agreement. By mandating arbitration as the dispute resolution forum, the clause determines which adjudicatory process applies to claims arising from the service relationship.
Users agree that disputes with T-Mobile proceed through binding arbitration rather than traditional court proceedings, except for matters eligible for small claims court. This provision modifies the forum and procedural rules applicable to potential service-related disputes.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 28 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by T-Mobile.