This analysis describes what T-Mobile's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution under the service agreement. By mandating arbitration as the dispute resolution forum, the clause determines which adjudicatory process applies to claims arising from the service relationship.
Users agree that disputes with T-Mobile proceed through binding arbitration rather than traditional court proceedings, except for matters eligible for small claims court. This provision modifies the forum and procedural rules applicable to potential service-related disputes.
How other platforms handle this
You and Uber agree that any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof or the use of the Services or Application (collectively, "Disputes") will be settled by binding arbitration between you and ...
PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY – IT MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING YOUR RIGHT TO FILE A LAWSUIT IN COURT. YOU AND METAMASK AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE, CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OR THE BREACH, TERMINATION, ENFORCEMENT, INTERPRETATION OR VALI...
You and OpenAI agree to resolve any disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms or our Services through final and binding individual arbitration, except that either party may bring an individual claim in small claims court. You agree to waive your right to a jury trial and to participate in a...
Monitoring
T-Mobile has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"ANY DISPUTE YOU HAVE WITH T-MOBILE MUST BE RESOLVED THROUGH BINDING ARBITRATION OR IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT. YOU ARE WAIVING YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL OR TO HAVE A COURT RESOLVE ANY DISPUTE BETWEEN YOU AND T-MOBILE. EXCEPT FOR SMALL CLAIMS COURT CASES, ALL DISPUTES WILL BE RESOLVED BY BINDING ARBITRATION.— Excerpt from T-Mobile's T-Mobile Terms and Conditions
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution under the service agreement. By mandating arbitration as the dispute resolution forum, the clause determines which adjudicatory process applies to claims arising from the service relationship.
Users agree that disputes with T-Mobile proceed through binding arbitration rather than traditional court proceedings, except for matters eligible for small claims court. This provision modifies the forum and procedural rules applicable to potential service-related disputes.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 28 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by T-Mobile.