Provision record
Synthesia · Synthesia Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction Consent by Both Parties

High severity Explicit document language Common · 267 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Synthesia and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF

This analysis describes what Synthesia's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
4
Months Monitored
Jul 10, 2026
First Seen
Jul 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1499 other provisions on other platforms.

How other platforms handle this

Datadog Medium

the Parties expressly consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in those courts.

Tinder Medium

You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.

Plaid Medium

The jurisdiction and venue for actions related to these Terms will be the state and United States federal courts located in San Francisco, California and both Parties submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The courts located in the applicable venue above will have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate any dispute arising out of or relating to the Contract or its formation, interpretation or enforcement. Each party hereby consents and submits...

Excerpt from Synthesia's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Synthesia Terms of Service
Entity
Synthesia
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-046223
Document ID
CA-D-00471
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
ad7eced3d63c9adc5930b8cce31cc3296ed7d3d4ea35081a5c1e458b31820557
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:47 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Synthesia
Document: Synthesia Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-046223
Captured: 2026-07-09 04:47:54 UTC
SHA-256: ad7eced3d63c9adc…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/synthesia/synthesia-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-046223/exclusive-jurisdiction-consent-by-both-parties/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Synthesia's Exclusive Jurisdiction Consent by Both Parties clause do?

The clause states: “The courts located in the applicable venue above will have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate any dispute arising out of or relating to the Contract or its formation, interpretation or enforcement. Each party hereby consents and submits...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Synthesia?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Synthesia.