This analysis describes what Stripe's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
you represent and warrant that (i) you are not located in a country that is subject to a U.S. Government embargo...and (ii) you are not listed on any U.S. Government list of prohibited or restricted parties.
By using the Services, you represent and warrant that you are not located in any such country or on any such list.
You hereby represent that neither you or the organization you represent are named on any U.S. government list of prohibited or restricted parties, nor are you or your organization owned or controlled by or acting on behalf of any such parties.
"By using the Stripe Technology, User represents and warrants that User is not (i) located in or organized under the laws of any High-Risk Jurisdiction; (ii) a High-Risk Person; or (iii) owned 50% or more, or controlled, by...Excerpt from Stripe's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “By using the Stripe Technology, User represents and warrants that User is not (i) located in or organized under the laws of any High-Risk Jurisdiction; (ii) a High-Risk Person; or (iii) owned 50% or more, or controlled, by...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 183 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stripe.