This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The liability cap restricts the range of damages Revolut may be required to pay in breach scenarios to direct losses caused by contractual violations, while excluding entire categories of loss from recovery. This allocation establishes the financial scope of Revolut's exposure under the agreement and defines which loss categories fall outside the liability framework.
Under this clause, users cannot recover damages for indirect, consequential, or special losses—including lost profits, lost business opportunity, or reputational harm—even if Revolut breaches the agreement. Recoverable damages are limited to direct losses caused by Revolut's breach, with carve-outs preserving claims for death, personal injury, negligence, and fraud.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event will Synthesia's aggregate liability to you under or in connection with this Agreement exceed the total fees paid or payable by you to Synthesia in the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding the event giving rise to the claim. In...
Google's total liability to you for any claims under these terms, including for any implied warranties, is limited to the amount you paid us to use the Gemini API (or, if we choose, to supplying you the services again) in the 12 months before the breach.
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, DUOLINGO SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUES, WHETHER INCURRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR ANY LOSS OF DATA, USE, GOODWILL, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES, RESUL...
Monitoring
Revolut has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We won't be responsible for any losses that are not caused by our breach of this Agreement; any loss or corruption of data; any indirect, special, or consequential losses; or any loss of profit, loss of business, or loss of reputation. We don't exclude or limit our responsibility for death or personal injury caused by our negligence, fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, or any other responsibility that cannot be excluded or limited by law.— Excerpt from Revolut's Revolut Terms of Service
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The liability cap restricts the range of damages Revolut may be required to pay in breach scenarios to direct losses caused by contractual violations, while excluding entire categories of loss from recovery. This allocation establishes the financial scope of Revolut's exposure under the agreement and defines which loss categories fall outside the liability framework.
Under this clause, users cannot recover damages for indirect, consequential, or special losses—including lost profits, lost business opportunity, or reputational harm—even if Revolut breaches the agreement. Recoverable damages are limited to direct losses caused by Revolut's breach, with carve-outs preserving claims for death, personal injury, negligence, and fraud.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.