Provision record
Plaid · Plaid Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Confidential Disclosure Permitted Under Court Order

Common · 289 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Plaid and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Plaid's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Kling AI

You may be required to provide certain categories of Data to us under the following circumstances: (i) as required under any applicable laws or regulations; (ii) as required under any contract entered into between us...

Anyscale

Neither Party may assign, transfer or novate this Agreement, by operation of law or otherwise (“ Assign ”), without the other Party’s prior written consent, provided that subject to the remainder of this Section, either Party may freely Assign this Agreement to a successor in interest upon a merger ...

OpenAI

These Terms contain the entire agreement between you and OpenAI regarding the Services and, other than any Service-specific terms, supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements between you and OpenAI.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information as required by law or court order; provided that, Receiving Party provides Disclosing Party with prompt written notice thereof and uses its best efforts to limit disclosure

Excerpt from Plaid's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Plaid Terms of Use
Entity
Plaid
Date stated by the document
Jan. 19, 2024
As printed in Plaid’s text (version CA-V-001194), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-001194, captured May 5, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-051327
Document ID
CA-D-000535
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-001194)
0f3fed52e21f302718fe183e6a2f9d49296f90d08c68b9311af91b63f315a12b
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 09:31 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-001194, captured May 5, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Plaid
Document: Plaid Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-051327
Version: CA-V-001194
Captured: 2026-05-05 05:43:54 UTC
SHA-256: 0f3fed52e21f3027…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/plaid/plaid-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-051327/confidential-disclosure-permitted-under-court-order/
Accessed: Nov. 2, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Plaid's Confidential Disclosure Permitted Under Court Order clause do?

The clause states: “Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information as required by law or court order; provided that, Receiving Party provides Disclosing Party with prompt written notice thereof and uses its best efforts to limit disclosure”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Plaid?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Plaid.