OpenAI prohibits using its tools to help break into computer systems without permission, conduct unauthorized surveillance, or build personal profiles on individuals without their knowledge or consent.
This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision covers both cybersecurity intrusion and privacy-violating data aggregation, addressing a broad range of potential misuse from hacking to building unauthorized surveillance tools, and the privacy aggregation component is particularly relevant for data brokers, researchers, and analytics firms.
Interpretive note: The scope of 'without authorization' and 'without consent' in the data aggregation context requires judgment about what consent mechanisms are sufficient and what constitutes authorization for research or analytics purposes.
Consumers have a policy-backed assurance that OpenAI's tools are not permitted to be used to aggregate personal data about them without authorization or to conduct surveillance on them, though the practical enforcement of this protection depends on operator compliance and OpenAI's monitoring of API use.
How other platforms handle this
You may not access or use the Services for purposes of developing or offering competitive products or services. You may not reverse engineer the Services or the Assets. You may not use automated tools to access, interact with, or generate Assets through the Services. You may not resell or redistribu...
Messaging Abuse. Sending bulk unsolicited commercial email, whether through your own server or any other server on the internet (also known as 'spam'). Sending any unsolicited commercial message for the purpose of advertising or promoting goods, services, or websites. Sending commercial messages to ...
You may not use Runway's tools to create content that promotes, glorifies, or facilitates acts of terrorism, mass violence, or genocide, or that could be used to provide material support to individuals or organizations engaged in such activities.
Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Don't facilitate unauthorized access to computer systems, networks, or personal data, or use AI to conduct surveillance, build profiles on individuals without consent, or aggregate personal data without authorization.— Excerpt from OpenAI's OpenAI Usage Policies
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (unauthorized access), GDPR (unauthorized data processing and profiling of individuals), CCPA (unauthorized collection and aggregation of personal data), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Illinois BIPA (biometric data in surveillance contexts), and the FTC Act's unfair practices authority over surveillance and data aggregation. The FTC has brought enforcement actions against data brokers and surveillance technology providers under Section 5 of the FTC Act. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium to High for operators in data analytics, people-search, marketing technology, and security sectors. The prohibition on aggregating personal data without authorization and building individual profiles without consent directly implicates data broker and marketing analytics use cases. Operators should assess whether their intended use of OpenAI for data enrichment or profiling purposes satisfies this provision. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU operators face GDPR Article 22 automated decision-making and profiling obligations in addition to this policy restriction. California operators must assess CCPA rights regarding automated profiling and data aggregation. Illinois operators building surveillance tools should assess BIPA applicability. The prohibition on unauthorized access applies globally under applicable computer crime statutes. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Data analytics vendors, marketing technology firms, and research organizations using OpenAI should review whether their use cases involve personal data aggregation or profiling that could violate this provision; update data processing agreements to reflect the restriction; and conduct privacy impact assessments for AI-assisted profiling use cases. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Operators should map all use cases involving personal data processing against this provision; assess whether consent mechanisms are adequate for any profiling or data aggregation activities; conduct privacy impact assessments for surveillance or monitoring use cases; and review their data minimization practices to ensure compliance with both this policy and applicable privacy law.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision covers both cybersecurity intrusion and privacy-violating data aggregation, addressing a broad range of potential misuse from hacking to building unauthorized surveillance tools, and the privacy aggregation component is particularly relevant for data brokers, researchers, and analytics firms.
Consumers have a policy-backed assurance that OpenAI's tools are not permitted to be used to aggregate personal data about them without authorization or to conduct surveillance on them, though the practical enforcement of this protection depends on operator compliance and OpenAI's monitoring of API use.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.