Users who do not opt out within 30 days waive the right to participate in class action lawsuits, class-wide arbitration, and jury trials, and may only pursue individual claims against Noom.
This analysis describes what Noom's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users lose access to the court system and jury trials as a means of resolving disputes with Noom, limiting the procedural rights ordinarily available in civil litigation.
Interpretive note: The excerpt contains an additional disclosure that arbitration offers less discovery and appellate review than court; this is a separate informational proposition not stated in the canonical claim.
Noom's updated terms make clearer that the platform provides behavioral support, not medical treatment, and that coaching and food data features may not be fully accurate. This clarification is important for users who might view Noom as a substitute for medical advice or treatment. The terms now explicitly reserve Noom's right to suspend or revoke your access at any time, which expands the company's unilateral control over your account. Review the updated terms carefully, especially if you rely on Noom for health management or have shared sensitive health information on the platform.
View change record →Under this clause, users who do not opt out are limited to pursuing individual claims against Noom and cannot join class action lawsuits or class-wide arbitration proceedings.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
Monitoring
Noom has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"YOU ARE WAIVING YOUR RIGHT TO PURSUE DISPUTES OR CLAIMS AND SEEK RELIEF IN A COURT OF LAW AND TO HAVE A JURY TRIAL. IN ARBITRATION, THERE IS LESS DISCOVERY AND APPELLATE REVIEW THAN IN COURT.— Excerpt from Noom's Noom Terms of Service
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Class action waivers in consumer contracts interact with FTC enforcement authority and state consumer protection statutes; California courts have declined to enforce class action waivers in certain consumer contexts under California Civil Code Section 1751; the EU does not recognize binding class action waivers in consumer contracts under Directive 2020/1828 on representative actions. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The waiver applies to both class action lawsuits and class-wide arbitration, and is combined with a jury trial waiver, making it among the most comprehensive dispute resolution limitation structures in consumer contracts; enforceability is jurisdiction-dependent. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: California, New Jersey, and other states have specific judicial precedent or statutory frameworks that may limit enforceability of class action waivers in consumer service agreements; EU and UK users may retain class or collective action rights under applicable consumer protection law regardless of this clause. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: For enterprise or employer-sponsored deployments of Noom Health, compliance teams should confirm whether class action waiver provisions apply to organizational customers or are limited to individual end-user agreements. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should monitor jurisdiction-specific judicial developments regarding class action waiver enforceability in health and wellness subscription contexts, and ensure opt-out disclosure is operationally prominent at account creation.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 3 platforms + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Users lose access to the court system and jury trials as a means of resolving disputes with Noom, limiting the procedural rights ordinarily available in civil litigation.
Under this clause, users who do not opt out are limited to pursuing individual claims against Noom and cannot join class action lawsuits or class-wide arbitration proceedings.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Noom.