Provision record
Mercury · Mercury Terms of Service · View original document ↗

San Francisco Jurisdiction for Injunctive Relief

Medium severity Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 271 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Mercury changes these terms. Follow Mercury →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Mercury recorded 4 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Follow Mercury →
Monitor governance changes for Mercury Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Mercury →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Mercury's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 26, 2026

Mercury's updated terms establish detailed rules for how recurring autopay works on invoices. Under the revised language, payers authorize recurring ACH debits through a separate addendum, Mercury will not retry failed payments (except once if caused by a Mercury system issue), and autopay authorization will automatically cancel after two consecutive failures in a series. You can prevent autopay cancellation by ensuring payers have sufficient funds, re-enrolling the payer, or requesting manual payment if the series fails twice.

View change record →
Medium May 29, 2026

The updated terms establish that when customers pay invoices you issue through Mercury Invoicing via ACH debit, Mercury will apply a hold period before crediting the funds to your account. The hold period is determined by Mercury in its sole discretion based on risk factors related to the transaction, payer, and payment history, and may range from 1 to 4 business days from the date the ACH debit is initiated. Mercury will display an estimated funds availability date for each incoming invoice payment in your Invoicing dashboard.

View change record →

How other platforms handle this

Perplexity AI Medium

it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.

Cohere Medium

This choice of jurisdiction does not prevent Cohere from seeking injunctive relief with respect to a violation of intellectual property rights or confidentiality obligations in any appropriate jurisdiction.

GitHub Medium

Any claim for injunctive relief with respect to a violation of section D.9 may be brought in any jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Mercury has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Mercury → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in San Francisco County, California for any actions for which we retain the right to seek injunctive or other equitable relief...

Excerpt from Mercury's Terms of Service

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Mercury Terms of Service
Entity
Mercury
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-047431
Document ID
CA-D-00529
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
3ac7ab54812d292da7660282e68a275955e77d625774ffe806d425e9b70bcc72
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:51 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Mercury
Document: Mercury Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-047431
Captured: 2026-07-09 04:51:50 UTC
SHA-256: 3ac7ab54812d292d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/mercury/mercury-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-047431/san-francisco-jurisdiction-for-injunctive-relief/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Mercury's San Francisco Jurisdiction for Injunctive Relief clause do?

The clause states: “You agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in San Francisco County, California for any actions for which we retain the right to seek injunctive or other equitable relief...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 271 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Mercury?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mercury.