This analysis describes what Google Gemini's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause establishes user responsibility for determining what content is appropriate to submit based on Google's stated use of conversation data for model improvement purposes. This frames data handling practices and clarifies the scope of information that may be processed.
The updated notice now explicitly identifies Memory as a feature that operates on the basis of user consent, alongside Voice Match. The revised language removes prior geographic restrictions on personalization, meaning Gemini can now reference chat history to generate personalized insights for all users globally, not just those outside the EEA, Switzerland, and the UK. The removal of the statement 'Keep Activity must be on to use this feature' simplifies the operational requirement but does not establish a new obligation. You can learn how to turn the Memory feature on or off through the updated privacy notice.
View change record →The updated privacy notice now discloses that Gemini can use data from connected Google apps and imported memory or chats from other AI platforms to personalize your experience and to improve services, including training generative AI models. This data is treated similarly to other Gemini activity. You can manage or delete your imported activity anytime through the Activity controls.
View change record →The updated privacy notice no longer discloses how Google Gemini uses data from connected Google apps to personalize user experience. Previously, the policy explained eligibility requirements and the opt-in process for this personalization feature. The removal means users no longer have a documented disclosure of this data practice in the privacy notice itself, though the operational status of the Connected Apps feature and whether it remains available is not clarified by this change.
View change record →Users operate under terms that authorize Google to review conversation content and use it to improve AI models. The provision places responsibility on users to self-select what information they input based on this disclosure of potential uses.
How other platforms handle this
We are simplifying our Terms of Use, including clarifications around the use of AI tools, and their data use. We have moved the terms that describe AI Features, which were previously written for a Creator audience and located under the AI-Based Tools Supplemental Terms and Disclaimer, into the User ...
Data publicly available on the Internet. Our artificial intelligence models are trained on data that is publicly available on the Internet by third parties, which may contain personal data, even if we use good practices to filter out such personal data. [...] Training Datasets. In some cases, we acc...
Writer does not use Customer Data to train its AI models without explicit customer permission. Customer Data means the data, content, and information that customers and their end users submit to or through the Services.
Monitoring
Google Gemini has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Don't include information in your conversations with Gemini Apps that you wouldn't want to be reviewed or used to improve Google's AI models. Please don't share confidential information in your Gemini Apps conversations.— Excerpt from Google Gemini's Gemini Apps Privacy Notice
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause establishes user responsibility for determining what content is appropriate to submit based on Google's stated use of conversation data for model improvement purposes. This frames data handling practices and clarifies the scope of information that may be processed.
Users operate under terms that authorize Google to review conversation content and use it to improve AI models. The provision places responsibility on users to self-select what information they input based on this disclosure of potential uses.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google Gemini.