If you post content on D&B's site and it causes a legal claim against D&B, you are personally responsible for covering D&B's legal costs and any resulting liability.
This analysis describes what Dun & Bradstreet's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This indemnification obligation means that individuals or businesses that post content, including business reviews or comments, could face financial exposure if that content triggers a third-party legal claim against D&B.
Users who post any content on D&B's site agree to cover D&B's legal costs and damages if that content leads to a lawsuit or claim against D&B; this is a meaningful financial risk for anyone who posts reviews, comments, or other material on the platform.
How other platforms handle this
You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Figma and its officers, directors, employees, contractors, agents, licensors, service providers, subcontractors and suppliers from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses or fees (including reasonable ...
If you use our Products for any commercial or business purposes or if you use the Products in a manner that is not permitted by these Terms or our policies, and we face any claims, lawsuits, damages, losses, or expenses arising out of your use, you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from and ag...
If you're a business user, you will defend and indemnify Google and its affiliates, officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities, damages, losses, and costs (including reasonable legal fees) arising out of or relating to: any allegation or claim that your content or your use of the services ...
Monitoring
Dun & Bradstreet has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"By posting content to any blog, you warrant that you either own or otherwise control all of the rights to that content, including, without limitation, all the rights necessary for you to provide, post, upload, input or submit the content, or that your use of the content is a protected fair use. You agree that you will not knowingly and with intent to defraud provide material and misleadingly false information. You warrant also that the content you supply does not violate these Terms of Use, and that you will indemnify and hold Dun & Bradstreet harmless for any and all claims resulting from content you supply.— Excerpt from Dun & Bradstreet's D&B Terms of Use
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: User indemnification clauses are generally enforceable in commercial contexts under US contract law but may be subject to consumer protection limitations in certain jurisdictions. The FTC has not specifically regulated user indemnification clauses in terms of service, but overly broad indemnification requirements could be assessed under unfair practice standards if they effectively deter users from posting legitimate content or exercising free speech rights. State consumer protection statutes in California and other jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of indemnification provisions against individual consumers. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. The indemnification is limited to content the user supplies and claims arising from that content, which is a standard scope. However, the breadth of 'any and all claims' creates open-ended financial exposure for users, particularly individuals who may not have the resources to evaluate whether their content creates liability. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive and UK consumer contract regulations may limit the enforceability of open-ended indemnification obligations against individual consumers. California's consumer protection framework may similarly constrain indemnification provisions that are disproportionate to the user's actual role or contribution. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers whose employees post content on D&B's site in a business capacity should assess whether this indemnification obligation creates corporate liability exposure and whether their own policies address employee use of third-party platforms. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should advise internal users to review content before posting on D&B's platforms and ensure that any content posted on behalf of the organization is reviewed for third-party IP rights and accuracy to minimize indemnification exposure.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This indemnification obligation means that individuals or businesses that post content, including business reviews or comments, could face financial exposure if that content triggers a third-party legal claim against D&B.
Users who post any content on D&B's site agree to cover D&B's legal costs and damages if that content leads to a lawsuit or claim against D&B; this is a meaningful financial risk for anyone who posts reviews, comments, or other material on the platform.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Dun & Bradstreet.