DraftKings · DraftKings Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Biometric Data Collection and Verification

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for DraftKings Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

DraftKings uses third-party identity verification services to scan your facial geometry or other biometric data when verifying your identity. The company states it does not retain this biometric data after the verification is complete, but the actual processing is done by external vendors.

This analysis describes what DraftKings's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Biometric data is among the most sensitive personal information categories because it is immutable. State laws like Illinois BIPA impose strict requirements and statutory damages for non-compliant biometric data collection, making this provision legally significant regardless of the stated retention limit.

Interpretive note: The provision does not name the identity verification vendors or provide a standalone biometric retention schedule, creating uncertainty about whether the stated practices fully satisfy BIPA and CUBI requirements.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

When you verify your identity on DraftKings, your facial geometry or similar biometric identifiers are captured and processed by third-party vendors. The policy states this data is not retained beyond the transaction, but users have limited ability to independently verify vendor-side retention or processing practices.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Delete Your Data
    Email privacy@draftkings.com to request information about what biometric data was collected during identity verification and to request confirmation of deletion. Identify your account and the nature of your request clearly.

How other platforms handle this

PlanetScale Medium

When you visit the Careers portion of our websites, we collect the information that you provide to us in connection with your job application. This includes but is not limited to business and personal contact information, professional credentials and skills, educational and work history and other in...

American Airlines Medium

American does not knowingly collect personal information directly from children – persons under the age of 13, or another age if required by applicable law – other than when required to comply with the law or for safety and security reasons. Due to the nature of our Services, we may collect travel i...

GOAT Medium

We may collect information about your location, including precise geolocation information, when you use our Services. We use this information to provide location-based services, such as showing you products available in your area, and for other purposes described in this Privacy Policy.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

DraftKings has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
DraftKings may use the biometric information we receive from our identity verification service providers for the purpose of verifying your identity. We do not directly collect your biometric information; rather, our identity verification service providers collect and process this information on our behalf. We do not store your biometric information beyond the completion of the verification transaction. The biometric information collected by our identity verification service providers in connection with the verification of your identity may include facial geometry or other biometric information as defined by applicable law.

— Excerpt from DraftKings's DraftKings Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision directly engages the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA, 740 ILCS 14), the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ch. 503), and Washington's My Health MY Data Act to the extent biometric data intersects with health-adjacent data. BIPA provides a private right of action with statutory damages of $1,000 to $5,000 per violation. The FTC Act's unfair or deceptive practices standards also apply. The enforcement authority under BIPA is private litigants and Illinois courts; under CUBI, the Texas AG. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The delegation of biometric processing to unnamed third-party identity verification service providers, combined with the absence of explicit vendor identification, creates audit and contractual exposure. BIPA requires written informed consent and a publicly available retention schedule prior to collection. The notice's statement that biometric data is not retained 'beyond the completion of the verification transaction' may not satisfy BIPA's written policy and retention schedule requirements if not accompanied by a standalone biometric data policy. JURISDICTION FLAGS: Illinois creates the highest exposure due to BIPA's private right of action and class action history. Texas CUBI enforcement by the AG is an emerging risk. California CPRA treats biometric data as sensitive personal information requiring opt-in consent for certain uses. New York does not yet have a biometric-specific statute but has introduced legislation. Users in the EU/EEA would have additional rights under GDPR Article 9 governing special category data. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: The provision does not name the identity verification service providers processing biometric data. Procurement teams should verify that data processing agreements with these vendors include BIPA-compliant provisions, explicit retention schedules, data destruction certifications, and indemnification for biometric data violations. The assertion that DraftKings does not 'directly collect' biometric data does not eliminate BIPA liability if DraftKings is deemed to be in possession of or benefit from the data. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should review whether a standalone biometric data retention and destruction policy has been published as required by BIPA. Consent mechanisms for biometric collection should be audited to confirm they are obtained prior to collection and are not bundled solely within general privacy notice acceptance. Data mapping should identify all identity verification vendors and confirm contractual obligations align with applicable state biometric statutes.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices in biometric data collection and has issued guidance on biometric privacy; applicable if vendor disclosures or retention practices are misleading
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general in Illinois (BIPA), Texas (CUBI), and other states with biometric or sensitive data laws have enforcement authority over non-compliant biometric data collection practices
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
TCPA
United States Federal
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
DraftKings Privacy Policy
Entity
DraftKings
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-009840
Document ID
CA-D-00349
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
746a0af91f91549a4cccc84c53383f8b4aafe001e33d9588879ca505f067613c
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 11:19 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: DraftKings
Document: DraftKings Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-009840
Captured: 2026-05-08 11:19:01 UTC
SHA-256: 746a0af91f91549a…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/draftkings/draftkings-privacy-policy/biometric-data-collection-and-verification/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does DraftKings's Biometric Data Collection and Verification clause do?

Biometric data is among the most sensitive personal information categories because it is immutable. State laws like Illinois BIPA impose strict requirements and statutory damages for non-compliant biometric data collection, making this provision legally significant regardless of the stated retention limit.

How does this clause affect you?

When you verify your identity on DraftKings, your facial geometry or similar biometric identifiers are captured and processed by third-party vendors. The policy states this data is not retained beyond the transaction, but users have limited ability to independently verify vendor-side retention or processing practices.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with DraftKings?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DraftKings.