This analysis describes what AWS's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The indemnifying party is notified promptly in writing by the indemnified party of any Indemnifiable Claim and the indemnified party will reasonably cooperate with the indemnifying party in the defense of the Indemnifiable Claim, at the indemnifying party's expense.
Customer must provide us with prompt written notice of any Claim Against Customer and allow us the right to assume the exclusive defense and control...
Any settlement requiring the indemnified party to admit liability, pay money, or take (or refrain from taking) any action, will require the indemnified party's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld...
"The obligations under this Section 7 will apply only if the party seeking defense or indemnity: (a) gives the other party prompt written notice of the claimExcerpt from AWS's Customer Agreement
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “The obligations under this Section 7 will apply only if the party seeking defense or indemnity: (a) gives the other party prompt written notice of the claim”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS.