This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The provision establishes a default data use authorization for model training with conditional opt-out capability, while preserving Anthropic's ability to use certain categories of user content regardless of opt-out status. This structure means safety-flagged conversations and user-reported materials remain available for model improvement even when users exercise the opt-out.
Users may opt out of model training use through account settings, but this opt-out does not apply to conversations flagged during safety review processes or to content the user has explicitly reported. Users who do not opt out authorize use of all inputs and outputs for model training and service improvement.
How other platforms handle this
Only models with a post-mitigation score of "medium" or below can be deployed. Only models with a post-mitigation score of "high" or below can be developed further.
For information on how we process personal data through "profiling" and "automated decision-making", please see our FAQ.
Training Datasets. In some cases, we access datasets provided by third parties for our model training purposes. These datasets may include personal data (even if such third parties and Mistral AI use good practices to filter out such personal data), proprietary data, or public data. [...] Data publi...
Monitoring
Anthropic has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We may use your Inputs and Outputs to train our models and improve our Services, unless you opt out through your account settings. Even if you opt-out, we will use Inputs and Outputs for model improvement when: (1) your conversations are flagged for safety review to improve our ability to detect harmful content, enforce our policies, or advance AI safety research, or (2) you've explicitly reported the materials to us (for example via our feedback mechanisms).— Excerpt from Anthropic's Anthropic Privacy Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The provision establishes a default data use authorization for model training with conditional opt-out capability, while preserving Anthropic's ability to use certain categories of user content regardless of opt-out status. This structure means safety-flagged conversations and user-reported materials remain available for model improvement even when users exercise the opt-out.
Users may opt out of model training use through account settings, but this opt-out does not apply to conversations flagged during safety review processes or to content the user has explicitly reported. Users who do not opt out authorize use of all inputs and outputs for model training and service improvement.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.