This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The provision establishes a default data use practice for model training with a conditional opt-out right, while carving out specific use cases (safety review and user-reported content) that operate independently of the opt-out election. This structure means users must affirmatively manage their data use preferences through account settings to limit training data use.
Users operate under terms that permit their inputs and outputs to be used for model training and service improvement unless they elect opt-out through account settings. However, conversations flagged for safety review and materials the user explicitly reports remain available for training use even after opting out.
How other platforms handle this
To improve the quality of our services, we analyse texts submitted for translation. We ensure that this analysis cannot be traced back to individual users by anonymising the data before analysis. DeepL Pro subscribers' texts are not used to train our machine translation systems.
We are simplifying our Terms of Use, including clarifications around the use of AI tools, and their data use. We have moved the terms that describe AI Features, which were previously written for a Creator audience and located under the AI-Based Tools Supplemental Terms and Disclaimer, into the User ...
Data publicly available on the Internet. Our artificial intelligence models are trained on data that is publicly available on the Internet by third parties, which may contain personal data, even if we use good practices to filter out such personal data. [...] Training Datasets. In some cases, we acc...
Monitoring
Anthropic has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We may use your Inputs and Outputs to train our models and improve our Services, unless you opt out through your account settings. Even if you opt-out, we will use Inputs and Outputs for model improvement when: (1) your conversations are flagged for safety review to improve our ability to detect harmful content, enforce our policies, or advance AI safety research, or (2) you've explicitly reported the materials to us (for example via our feedback mechanisms).— Excerpt from Anthropic's Anthropic Privacy Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The provision establishes a default data use practice for model training with a conditional opt-out right, while carving out specific use cases (safety review and user-reported content) that operate independently of the opt-out election. This structure means users must affirmatively manage their data use preferences through account settings to limit training data use.
Users operate under terms that permit their inputs and outputs to be used for model training and service improvement unless they elect opt-out through account settings. However, conversations flagged for safety review and materials the user explicitly reports remain available for training use even after opting out.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 2 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.