You agree not to participate in any class action, group lawsuit, or representative legal proceeding against Yelp, including actions under laws that allow consumers to bring claims on behalf of others.
This analysis describes what Yelp's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Class actions allow many people with small individual claims to pursue them together efficiently; waiving this right means each person must bring their own individual claim, which may not be economically practical for small disputes.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of the class action waiver varies significantly by jurisdiction; it may be unenforceable in EEA and UK markets and subject to challenge in California under PAGA.
This separates the class action waiver into its own distinct provision with prominent notice formatting, strengthening Yelp's legal position by emphasizing the waiver of class and representative actions.
View full change record →This waiver means that even if a large number of Yelp users experience the same harm, each person must individually arbitrate their own claim rather than joining together, which can make pursuing small-value grievances impractical.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
WHERE PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE LAW, YOU AND NETFLIX AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless ...
Monitoring
Yelp has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"PLEASE NOTE: THESE TERMS INCLUDE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS (SEE SECTION 13) THAT, WITH LIMITED EXCEPTIONS, REQUIRE THAT (1) CLAIMS YOU BRING AGAINST YELP BE RESOLVED BY BINDING, INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION, AND (2) YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO BRING OR PARTICIPATE IN ANY CLASS, GROUP, OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTION OR PROCEEDING.— Excerpt from Yelp's Yelp Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Class action waivers in consumer contracts have been challenged under state consumer protection statutes and, in some contexts, under the National Labor Relations Act where employee claims are involved. The FTC has expressed concern about class action waivers that limit consumer redress. In the EEA and UK, such waivers in consumer contracts are likely unenforceable under consumer protection frameworks that preserve access to courts and collective redress mechanisms. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The waiver is broad, covering class, group, and representative actions. If invalidated in a given jurisdiction, the class action risk profile for Yelp increases materially in that market. California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims may not be fully waivable under California law, creating a specific enforcement gap. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California presents heightened exposure due to PAGA and California consumer protection law. EEA member states and UK represent jurisdictions where the waiver is likely unenforceable as a matter of mandatory law. Illinois and New York also have strong consumer protection frameworks that legal teams should evaluate. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Business account holders who are legal entities may face a different analysis than individual consumers. Vendor and partner agreements referencing these Terms should be reviewed for downstream class action risk allocation. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: The company should monitor judicial and regulatory developments regarding class action waiver enforceability, particularly in California and the EEA. If a class action waiver is invalidated in a jurisdiction, the company should have a contingency plan for managing representative claims in that market.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Class actions allow many people with small individual claims to pursue them together efficiently; waiving this right means each person must bring their own individual claim, which may not be economically practical for small disputes.
This waiver means that even if a large number of Yelp users experience the same harm, each person must individually arbitrate their own claim rather than joining together, which can make pursuing small-value grievances impractical.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Yelp.