California law governs this agreement, and any court cases (beyond arbitration) must be filed in San Francisco courts.
If you are outside the United States and have a legal dispute with W&B that is not resolved by arbitration, you would need to litigate in San Francisco courts under California law, creating significant practical and financial barriers to seeking legal redress.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Governing Law and Jurisdiction and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Non-US customers — particularly EU businesses — may face jurisdictional and choice-of-law conflicts, as California law may not provide the same protections as their home jurisdiction, and litigating in San Francisco courts is impractical for international users.
(1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Choice of California law and San Francisco jurisdiction provisions are standard for US-headquartered SaaS companies. However, for EU customers, GDPR Art. 79 provides data subjects the right to lodge complaints with their local supervisory authority and pursue legal remedies before their local courts — California choice of law cannot override this right for GDPR-governed claims. The Brussels I Regulation (Recast) may restrict the enforceability of exclusive jurisdiction clauses against EU consumers. (2)
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.