This analysis describes what Stash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Don't do anything that places an unreasonably large load on our Services' infrastructure, use any robots, spiders, scrapers or other automated means to access our Services, try to interfere with the proper working of our Service or attempt to bypass any of our security measures
We also require that certain popular apps apply for access to certain data.
We limit third-party access to this content and aggregate information (for example, voting ratios) before sharing.
"uses or launches any automated system, including "robots," "spiders," or "offline readers," to access any Content or our systems or to "data mine" or in any way reproduce or circumvent the navigational structure...Excerpt from Stash's Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “uses or launches any automated system, including "robots," "spiders," or "offline readers," to access any Content or our systems or to "data mine" or in any way reproduce or circumvent the navigational structure...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 106 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stash.