Stability AI · Stability AI Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Policy

Medium severity Low confidence Inferredfromcontext Uncommon · 14 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Stability AI Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Stability AI's terms require users to comply with a separate Acceptable Use Policy that defines prohibited uses of the platform and AI-generated outputs. Violations may result in account suspension or termination.

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The Acceptable Use Policy defines the boundaries of permissible activity on the platform, and non-compliance carries the consequence of account suspension or termination, which is particularly material for developers and businesses with production dependencies on the service.

Interpretive note: The full text of the Acceptable Use Policy and its incorporation by reference into the Terms of Use was not available in the truncated document. Analysis is based on the document's subject matter and standard AI platform practice.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

All users are required to comply with Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy, which restricts certain categories of content generation and use. Failure to comply with these restrictions may result in loss of access to the platform and any associated account data or API credits.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated 'scraping'; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation 'robots,' 's...

Vercel Medium

You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated 'scraping'; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation 'robots,' 's...

Cohere Medium

Customer agrees to comply with Cohere's Acceptable Use Policy, as updated from time to time, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Customer may not use the Services for any unlawful purpose, to generate content that infringes third-party rights, or in any manner that violates appli...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Stability AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Acceptable use restrictions for AI-generated content engage the EU AI Act's prohibitions on certain AI applications and the FTC Act's standards regarding deceptive or harmful practices. For content involving minors, COPPA applies in the US. The EU AI Act, once fully in force, imposes specific obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models regarding prohibited use cases. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The practical enforcement of the Acceptable Use Policy is at Stability AI's discretion, and the absence of defined procedural rights for users whose accounts are suspended creates compliance and continuity risk for enterprise deployments. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU users face heightened exposure because the EU AI Act creates affirmative obligations on AI providers that flow downstream to deployers and users. US enterprise customers subject to sector-specific regulation, such as financial services or healthcare, should assess whether their intended use cases are permitted under both the Acceptable Use Policy and applicable regulation. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams assessing Stability AI as a vendor should verify that their intended use cases are explicitly permitted under the Acceptable Use Policy, and should include contractual representations regarding compliance in any downstream licensing or service agreements. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should document their review of the Acceptable Use Policy against their organization's intended AI use cases, and establish internal controls to ensure that end users of downstream applications built on Stability AI do not generate prohibited content categories. This is particularly relevant for organizations subject to the EU AI Act as deployers of AI systems.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices in consumer-facing AI services, including misrepresentation of permitted uses or enforcement of use restrictions.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
DMCA
United States Federal
DSA
European Union

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Terms of Use
Entity
Stability AI
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011585
Document ID
CA-D-00513
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
74df679aa316b742d1506ed4cb22f0dbf2fbfdc4faf5535dd964b7be0eee08c1
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 09:21 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-011585
Captured: 2026-05-08 09:21:53 UTC
SHA-256: 74df679aa316b742…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-terms-of-use/acceptable-use-policy/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy clause do?

The Acceptable Use Policy defines the boundaries of permissible activity on the platform, and non-compliance carries the consequence of account suspension or termination, which is particularly material for developers and businesses with production dependencies on the service.

How does this clause affect you?

All users are required to comply with Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy, which restricts certain categories of content generation and use. Failure to comply with these restrictions may result in loss of access to the platform and any associated account data or API credits.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 14 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.