This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes a categorical restriction on certain output types, defining prohibited use cases related to deceptive or fraudulent content generation. The provision operationalizes content policy boundaries by specifying named categories of prohibited output rather than general harm standards.
Interpretive note: The prohibition's interaction with legitimate creative, satirical, or research uses is not addressed in the policy, and the scope of 'designed to deceive' may require case-by-case interpretation.
Users are contractually required to refrain from generating content through the Services that falls within the specified prohibited categories: fake personas, fraudulent documents, disinformation campaigns, and impersonation content. Violation of this restriction constitutes a breach of the Acceptable Use Policy terms.
How other platforms handle this
You may not automatedly crawl or query the Services for any purpose or by any means (including, without limitation, screen and database scraping, spiders, robots, crawlers and any other automated activity with the purpose of obtaining information from the Services) unless you have received prior exp...
relate to transactions involving (f) the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime... (i) involve offering or receiving payments for the purpose of bribery or corruption.
You must not, and must not allow others to: Facilitate illegal or harmful activity through the End User Services; Cause harm to us or others through the End User Services;
Monitoring
Stability AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You may not use our Services to generate content designed to deceive, defraud, or mislead others, including the creation of fake personas, fraudulent documents, disinformation campaigns, or content intended to impersonate real individuals or organizations.— Excerpt from Stability AI's Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes a categorical restriction on certain output types, defining prohibited use cases related to deceptive or fraudulent content generation. The provision operationalizes content policy boundaries by specifying named categories of prohibited output rather than general harm standards.
Users are contractually required to refrain from generating content through the Services that falls within the specified prohibited categories: fake personas, fraudulent documents, disinformation campaigns, and impersonation content. Violation of this restriction constitutes a breach of the Acceptable Use Policy terms.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.