Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy establishes prohibited use categories for all users of its image, video, audio, and language AI models, whether accessed directly or through third-party applications via API. The policy prohibits generation of sexual content involving minors, non-consensual deepfakes, content promoting violence, and use for weapons development or critical infrastructure attacks. Third-party developers integrating Stability AI's models are bound by these same prohibitions and bear responsibility for platform compliance.
This document is Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), which governs the permitted and prohibited uses of Stability AI's models, APIs, and services, establishing a contractual framework under which users and developers may access the company's generative AI outputs. The agreement states that users must not use the services for unlawful purposes, generation of content that sexualizes minors, creation of disinformation or misleading synthetic media, harassment, or development of weapons or harmful systems, and the terms authorize Stability AI to suspend or terminate access for violations. The policy applies both to direct end-users and to developers or operators who deploy Stability AI models in downstream applications, which creates a layered compliance obligation where API customers bear responsibility for ensuring their platforms comply with the AUP. The document engages regulatory frameworks including the EU AI Act, which imposes requirements on providers and deployers of AI systems regarding prohibited use cases and high-risk applications, as well as relevant national laws on child sexual abuse material, export controls, and content moderation obligations under the UK Online Safety Act and the EU Digital Services Act. Compliance teams should note that the AUP's downstream operator obligations may require contractual flow-down provisions in B2B agreements, and that the prohibited use categories touching on biometric data, political manipulation, and critical infrastructure interact with sector-specific regulations across multiple jurisdictions.
Institutional analysis available with Compliance
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.
Start Compliance free trialMonitoring
Stability AI has updated this document before.
Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Compliance free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle CSAM and Child Sexual Exploitation Prohibition and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.