Snowflake · Snowflake Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Aggregate Liability Cap

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 2 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Snowflake recorded 3 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Snowflake Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

If something goes wrong and you want to hold Snowflake responsible, the maximum amount you can recover is limited to whatever fees you paid to Snowflake in the 12 months before your claim.

This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The agreement caps Snowflake's total financial exposure to the prior year of fees paid, regardless of the scale of data loss, service outage, or other harm; organizations with high-value or sensitive data stored on the platform should assess whether this cap is proportionate to their risk.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The liability cap provision limits recovery for any claim against Snowflake to fees paid in the prior 12 months, which may be substantially lower than the value of data or business impact at risk if a significant service failure or data loss event occurs.

How other platforms handle this

Signal Medium

THE SIGNAL PARTIES WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY LOST PROFITS OR CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES RELATING TO, ARISING OUT OF, OR IN ANY WAY IN CONNECTION WITH OUR TERMS, US, OR OUR SERVICES, EVEN IF THE SIGNAL PARTIES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH...

Anthropic Medium

Except as stated in Section L.3.b, the liability of each party, and its affiliates and licensors, for any damages arising out of or related to these Terms (i) excludes damages that are consequential, incidental, special, indirect, or exemplary damages, including lost profits, business, contracts, re...

Fitbit Medium

TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF FITBIT, AND ITS SUPPLIERS AND DISTRIBUTORS, FOR ANY CLAIMS UNDER THESE TERMS, INCLUDING FOR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT YOU PAID US TO USE THE SERVICES (OR, IF WE CHOOSE, TO SUPPLYING YOU THE SERVICES AGAIN) DURING THE TWELV...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Snowflake has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
SNOWFLAKE'S AGGREGATE LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY CUSTOMER IN THE TWELVE (12) MONTHS PRECEDING THE CLAIM.

— Excerpt from Snowflake's Snowflake Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability cap clauses in enterprise SaaS agreements are standard commercial practice and are generally enforceable under California contract law, which governs this agreement. However, in certain EU member states and under UK law, limitation of liability clauses may be subject to reasonableness tests under applicable unfair contract terms legislation, particularly in business-to-consumer contexts. The FTC Act's prohibition on deceptive practices does not directly regulate liability caps in B2B agreements. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High, for organizations storing large volumes of sensitive or business-critical data. The 12-month fee cap may represent a small fraction of the actual financial exposure from a data breach, extended outage, or data loss event, creating a significant indemnification gap that must be addressed through cyber insurance or contractual carve-outs. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK enterprise customers should assess whether the liability cap is subject to reasonableness review under local law, particularly where data processing obligations under GDPR are involved. Some jurisdictions do not permit limitation of liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct, and the agreement should be evaluated against those local standards. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should assess whether to negotiate a higher cap, carve-outs for data breach or gross negligence, or separate cyber liability coverage. The cap applies to Snowflake's aggregate liability, meaning multiple claims in a period share the same ceiling. Standard commercial practice in enterprise data platform agreements often includes negotiated caps at a multiple of annual contract value for specific breach scenarios. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should document the cap amount in vendor risk registers and ensure cyber insurance policies cover losses exceeding the contractual cap. Data breach response planning should account for the fact that Snowflake's contractual contribution to breach-related costs is limited to this amount.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Snowflake Terms of Service
Entity
Snowflake
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011316
Document ID
CA-D-00697
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
1ff84094bd39f9066b642f93cceeda7f67de590fbe6c3a1d08d48cc036234cc1
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 12:52 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Snowflake
Document: Snowflake Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-011316
Captured: 2026-05-10 12:52:25 UTC
SHA-256: 1ff84094bd39f906…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/snowflake/snowflake-terms-of-service/aggregate-liability-cap/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Snowflake's Aggregate Liability Cap clause do?

The agreement caps Snowflake's total financial exposure to the prior year of fees paid, regardless of the scale of data loss, service outage, or other harm; organizations with high-value or sensitive data stored on the platform should assess whether this cap is proportionate to their risk.

How does this clause affect you?

The liability cap provision limits recovery for any claim against Snowflake to fees paid in the prior 12 months, which may be substantially lower than the value of data or business impact at risk if a significant service failure or data loss event occurs.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 2 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Snowflake?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.