8 Total
2 High severity
5 Medium severity
1 Low severity
Summary

This document establishes the terms governing use of Slack's messaging and collaboration platform and is entered into between Slack and the customer organization, not individual end users. The agreement designates the customer organization as the party responsible for all legal obligations, data governance, and user management within the workspace. Workspace administrators designated by the customer organization are authorized to access, export, monitor, and delete all workspace data, including employee messages and files.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Slack's Main Services Agreement (MSA), governing the relationship between Slack Technologies LLC (or its affiliates) and the customer entity that subscribes to Slack's services, established on a B2B contractual basis where the customer organization bears primary legal responsibility for its authorized users' conduct. The agreement states that customers grant Slack a worldwide, non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, modify, and distribute customer data solely to provide and improve the services, while Slack asserts ownership of all service-related intellectual property and reserves the right to modify, suspend, or discontinue services with or without notice under certain conditions. Notably, the agreement positions the contracting party as the organizational customer rather than individual end users, meaning individual employees (authorized users) are governed through their employer's acceptance of these terms rather than any direct consumer relationship; the limitation of liability clause caps Slack's aggregate liability at amounts paid in the prior 12 months, and mutual indemnification obligations are structured in ways that place significant compliance responsibility on the customer organization. The agreement engages GDPR and related EU/EEA data protection frameworks through its Data Processing Addendum by reference, CCPA obligations for California-based customers, and standard commercial contract frameworks under California law; enforcement dependencies are jurisdiction-specific and organizations operating in regulated industries such as healthcare or financial services may face additional compliance obligations that the MSA alone does not resolve. Enterprise procurement teams should evaluate whether supplemental data processing agreements, BAAs, or sector-specific addenda are required before deployment.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Professional

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.

Start Professional free trial
High — 2 provisions
Medium — 5 provisions
Low — 1 provision

Monitoring

Slack has updated this document before.

Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Professional free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI Training Data Use and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured April 19, 2026 06:14 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000191
Version ID CA-V-000732
SHA-256 903983353b5e7b5755f681c28b6974fd4ccc7c02ead4886f927d8cde7158004b
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans