This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The £100 excess and £85,000 ceiling define the outer financial limits of a consumer's recovery for any single APP scam claim.
Readers making an APP scam claim will have £100 deducted and cannot recover more than £85,000 regardless of the loss amount.
How other platforms handle this
TINDER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY CONTENT THAT YOU OR ANOTHER USER OR THIRD PARTY POSTS, SENDS, RECEIVES, AND/OR ACTS ON THROUGH OUR SERVICES, NOR DOES TINDER ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE IDENTITY, INTENTIONS...
we do not warrant that Offering descriptions are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Please note that these third parties are responsible for their own privacy practices.
Monitoring
Revolut has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Each claim is subject to a £100 excess, with a maximum reimbursement limit of £85,000.— Excerpt from Revolut's Revolut Terms of Service
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The £100 excess and £85,000 ceiling define the outer financial limits of a consumer's recovery for any single APP scam claim.
Readers making an APP scam claim will have £100 deducted and cannot recover more than £85,000 regardless of the loss amount.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.