This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE LIABILITY OF DOORDASH FOR BREACH OF ANY NON-EXCLUDABLE PROVISION IS LIMITED TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AT DOORDASH'S OPTION: (A) IN THE CASE OF GOODS, THE REPLACEMENT OF THE GOODS OR THE SUPPLY OF EQUIVALENT GOODS...
We are liable for making sure that funds credited to you from Tap to Pay transactions are credited to your business profile...solely to the extent we receive such funds from the relevant card scheme, bank acquirer or other third-party
these Terms do not limit Spotify's liability for fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, death or personal injury to the extent that applicable law would prohibit such a limitation.
"We will only be responsible for foreseeable losses If we break the Agreement, we will only be responsible for any loss that we could have foreseen at the time we entered into the Agreement.Excerpt from Revolut's Terms of Service (Superseded URL)
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “We will only be responsible for foreseeable losses If we break the Agreement, we will only be responsible for any loss that we could have foreseen at the time we entered into the Agreement.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 287 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.