Pinecone reserves the right to modify the DPA, with changes governed by the procedures described in Section 15 of the Agreement.
This analysis describes what Pinecone's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause reserves Pinecone's right to modify the DPA unilaterally, which may affect the data protection commitments business customers rely upon for their own regulatory compliance. The modification procedure in Section 15 governs how and when changes take effect.
Interpretive note: The visible DPA text does not reproduce Section 15 governing modification procedures, making it impossible to assess the notice period, Customer rights upon modification, or whether modifications can reduce data protection commitments.
Business customers should monitor for DPA modifications, as changes to processing terms, security measures, or subprocessor authorizations could affect their own compliance posture. The specific notification and consent procedures for modifications are governed by Section 15 of the Agreement, which is not reproduced in the visible DPA text.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle DPA Modification by Pinecone and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Pinecone has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Pinecone may modify this Agreement from time to time, subject to Section 15 below.— Excerpt from Pinecone's Pinecone Data Processing Addendum
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Article 28 requires that data processing agreements reflect the current and accurate state of the controller-processor relationship. Unilateral modification rights may require evaluation under GDPR to confirm that material changes to processing terms do not require renewed controller authorization. EU supervisory authorities are the primary enforcement bodies. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The scope of Pinecone's modification right and the notice procedures in Section 15 are not fully visible in the DPA text provided, creating uncertainty about the practical impact of this reservation. If modifications can reduce data protection commitments with limited notice, business customers may face gaps in their compliance frameworks. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA and UK operations are most affected, as GDPR Article 28 establishes specific requirements for processor agreements that unilateral modifications must continue to satisfy. California operations should evaluate whether DPA modifications affect the service provider characterization under CCPA/CPRA. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should review Section 15 of the main Agreement to understand the modification notification period and the Customer's options upon receiving notice of a DPA change. Enterprise customers may seek to negotiate provisions requiring mutual agreement for material changes to data protection commitments. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should establish a process to review and evaluate any DPA modification notices from Pinecone, including assessment of whether changes affect existing DPIAs, transfer impact assessments, or regulatory filings. Material changes to the DPA may trigger obligations to update records of processing activities under GDPR Article 30.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause reserves Pinecone's right to modify the DPA unilaterally, which may affect the data protection commitments business customers rely upon for their own regulatory compliance. The modification procedure in Section 15 governs how and when changes take effect.
Business customers should monitor for DPA modifications, as changes to processing terms, security measures, or subprocessor authorizations could affect their own compliance posture. The specific notification and consent procedures for modifications are governed by Section 15 of the Agreement, which is not reproduced in the visible DPA text.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pinecone.