This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Our systems filter illegal or harmful content through both automated moderation and human review, while our AI models are designed with filters and limits to prevent inappropriate outputs.
Mistral AI may use automated tools, including algorithmic systems, to assist with the detection, identification, and moderation of content that may violate these Additional Terms, the Usage Policy or applicable law.
Runway uses a combination of automated systems and internal human review to detect and block harmful content in user inputs and outputs
"We use automated systems and human review to identify and address content that violates our Terms, including our Usage Policies.Excerpt from OpenAI's EU Terms of Use
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “We use automated systems and human review to identify and address content that violates our Terms, including our Usage Policies.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 139 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.