OpenAI · OpenAI EU Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Business Use Addendum: Indemnification Obligation

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time OpenAI changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity OpenAI recorded 27 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Get same-day alerts →
Monitor governance changes for OpenAI Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

Business and organizational users are required to indemnify OpenAI, its affiliates, and personnel against costs, losses, liabilities, and attorneys' fees arising from third-party claims related to their use of the services or violation of the terms.

This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This indemnification obligation applies broadly to any third-party claim arising out of or relating to business use of the services or Content, which could include claims by third parties whose data or intellectual property appears in user Content. Organizations should assess the scope of this obligation relative to their use cases.

Interpretive note: The breadth of 'arising out of or relating to your use of the Services and Content' creates interpretive uncertainty regarding which categories of third-party claims fall within the indemnification scope in specific use cases.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, business and organizational users bear indemnification obligations to OpenAI for third-party claims arising from their use of the services or Content, including attorneys' fees. The provision is qualified by the phrase 'to the extent permitted by law.'

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Business Use Addendum: Indemnification Obligation and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

OpenAI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Indemnity. If you are a business or organisation, to the extent permitted by law, you will indemnify and hold harmless us, our affiliates, and our personnel, from and against any costs, losses, liabilities, and expenses (including attorneys' fees) from third party claims arising out of or relating to your use of the Services and Content or any violation of these Terms.

Excerpt from OpenAI's EU Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Indemnification clauses in standard-form business contracts interact with applicable contract law across EEA member states, UK law, and California law as the designated governing law for business use. The enforceability of broad indemnification provisions may be subject to reasonableness requirements under applicable national law. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The indemnification obligation is broadly drafted to cover third-party claims arising out of or relating to use of the services, which could encompass intellectual property infringement claims, data protection claims, or other third-party actions triggered by business users' Content submissions. Organizations should assess the breadth of potential exposure. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California law governs per the Business Use Addendum. EEA and UK business users should assess whether California law application is enforceable under mandatory local law provisions and whether local indemnification standards differ materially. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should assess whether their standard vendor contract frameworks include equivalent indemnification reciprocity or caps, and whether this one-sided indemnification obligation creates imbalanced risk allocation relative to commercial norms. Legal review of the indemnification scope against the organization's actual use cases is advisable. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations should review their insurance coverage, including professional liability and cyber liability policies, to assess whether third-party claims triggering the indemnification obligation would be covered. Contract review processes should flag this provision when onboarding OpenAI as a vendor.

Full institutional analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Start Insight · $19.99/mo Start with Monitor · $4.99/mo

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC may evaluate broadly drafted indemnification obligations in standard-form business contracts as part of unfair commercial practices review.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
OpenAI EU Terms of Use
Entity
OpenAI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013864
Document ID
CA-D-00756
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
86ae292930d3782298e0436c053164660e09a9df37ec6ce35eccab5f9a771aa6
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: OpenAI
Document: OpenAI EU Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-013864
Captured: 2026-07-09 04:09:20 UTC
SHA-256: 86ae292930d37822…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/openai/openai-eu-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-013864/business-use-addendum-indemnification-obligation/
Accessed: July 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Start Insight · $19.99/mo Start with Monitor · $4.99/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OpenAI's Business Use Addendum: Indemnification Obligation clause do?

This indemnification obligation applies broadly to any third-party claim arising out of or relating to business use of the services or Content, which could include claims by third parties whose data or intellectual property appears in user Content. Organizations should assess the scope of this obligation relative to their use cases.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, business and organizational users bear indemnification obligations to OpenAI for third-party claims arising from their use of the services or Content, including attorneys' fees. The provision is qualified by the phrase 'to the extent permitted by law.'

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with OpenAI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.