This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This prohibition limits the use of AI-generated Output in high-stakes decisions that directly affect individuals' legal rights or material circumstances, reducing the risk of harm from automated or AI-assisted determinations.
Interpretive note: The excerpt is truncated after 'insurance'; further listed categories may be present in the full document but cannot be stated.
Users are prohibited from applying Output about a person to any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, including the listed categories of decisions.
How other platforms handle this
Request a review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data.
AI outputs may be incomplete, inaccurate, outdated, inappropriate, or inconsistent and may change over time. They are not a substitute for professional advice...You are responsible for your use of Outputs...
the Output from the Generative AI Features may not be unique across users, and the Generative AI Features may generate or return the same or similar Output to Walmart or a third party
"You must not use any Output relating to a person for any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, such as making credit, educational, employment, housing, insurance...Excerpt from OpenAI's EU Terms of Use
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This prohibition limits the use of AI-generated Output in high-stakes decisions that directly affect individuals' legal rights or material circumstances, reducing the risk of harm from automated or AI-assisted determinations.
Users are prohibited from applying Output about a person to any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, including the listed categories of decisions.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 217 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.