This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
the Receiving Party shall (other than to the extent prohibited by law) provide prior written notice to the Disclosing Party and reasonably cooperate...with any efforts by the Disclosing Party to contest or limit such disclosure requirement
If you would like to submit a legally binding request to demand someone else's Personal Data (for example, if you have a subpoena or court order), please review our Guidelines for Legal Requests.
your Review must clearly disclose any "material connection" you may have with Grubhub or the Merchant
"If Mistral AI is legally required to respond to the Rights Request, Mistral AI will promptly notify the Customer of such legal requirement and provide it with a copy of the request unless prohibited to do so by applicable law.Excerpt from Mistral AI's Data Processing Addendum
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “If Mistral AI is legally required to respond to the Rights Request, Mistral AI will promptly notify the Customer of such legal requirement and provide it with a copy of the request unless prohibited to do so by applicable law.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 273 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.