This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Customer agrees to provide information about intended uses of the Cloud Services and AI Model Services and compliance with this policy upon request from Groq.
we may disclose Confidential Information and Company Data if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (i) comply with legal process, applicable laws or government requests...
Company agrees to immediately notify Ramp in writing of any changes that may affect compliance with this Section.
"If Mistral AI is legally required to respond to the Rights Request, Mistral AI will promptly notify the Customer of such legal requirement and provide it with a copy of the request unless prohibited to do so by applicable law.Excerpt from Mistral AI's Data Processing Addendum
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “If Mistral AI is legally required to respond to the Rights Request, Mistral AI will promptly notify the Customer of such legal requirement and provide it with a copy of the request unless prohibited to do so by applicable law.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.