Provision record
Mistral AI · Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · View original document ↗

Mistral AI must inform Customer of conflicting legal requirements

Common · 267 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Mistral AI and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Baseten

Where Baseten receives an instruction from Customer that, in its reasonable opinion, infringes the GDPR, Baseten shall inform Customer.

Ford

Inform others who drive the vehicle, and passengers who connect their mobile devices to the vehicle, about the information in this Notice, including the Connected Vehicle Privacy section

Groq

Customer agrees to provide information about intended uses of the Cloud Services and AI Model Services and compliance with this policy upon request from Groq.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Mistral AI shall promptly inform Customer of such legal requirement, unless prohibited to do so by applicable law and/or on important grounds of public interest.

Excerpt from Mistral AI's Data Processing Addendum

Provision details

Document information
Document
Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum
Entity
Mistral AI
Date stated by the document
July 27, 2026
As printed in Mistral AI’s text (version CA-V-006754), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006754, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-061924
Document ID
CA-D-000771
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006754)
60acff3547f5a04d22bf895f1b248ecef43e99bf66252bd867ef8c9bee93e94f
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 11:22 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006754, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Mistral AI
Document: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum
Record ID: CA-P-061924
Version: CA-V-006754
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:55:39 UTC
SHA-256: 60acff3547f5a04d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/mistral-ai/mistral-ai-data-processing-addendum/provision/CA-P-061924/mistral-ai-must-inform-customer-of-conflicting-legal-requirements/
Accessed: Nov. 2, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Mistral AI's Mistral AI must inform Customer of conflicting legal requirements clause do?

The clause states: “Mistral AI shall promptly inform Customer of such legal requirement, unless prohibited to do so by applicable law and/or on important grounds of public interest.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Mistral AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.