This analysis describes what Miro's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The Indemnifying Party shall not, without the relevant applicable Indemnified Parties' prior written consent, agree to any settlement on behalf of such Indemnified Parties which includes either the obligation to pay any amounts, or any admissions of liability...
Atlassian may not settle an Infringement Claim without Customer's prior written consent if settlement would require Customer to admit fault or take or refrain from taking any action...
The Indemnifying Party will have the sole right to conduct the defense of any Claim for which the Indemnifying Party is responsible hereunder, provided that the Indemnifying Party may not settle any Claim without the Indemnified Party's prior written approval unless...
"The indemnifying party may not settle any claim without the indemnified party's prior consent if settlement would require the indemnified party to admit fault or take or refrain from taking any action...Excerpt from Miro's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “The indemnifying party may not settle any claim without the indemnified party's prior consent if settlement would require the indemnified party to admit fault or take or refrain from taking any action...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Miro.