This analysis describes what Miro's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The cap sets a hard ceiling on recoverable damages for either party, which directly limits the maximum financial remedy a Customer can obtain from Miro regardless of the severity of a breach.
Interpretive note: The excerpt references 'Excluded Claims' without defining them; the canonical claim preserves the carve-out but cannot characterize its scope.
If Miro causes harm, the most the Customer can recover is the amount the Customer paid or owed Miro in the 12 months before the claim, unless the claim falls within Excluded Claims.
How other platforms handle this
If you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to ActiveCampaign for certain costs and damages.
A party's liability for any Liability under these Terms will be reduced proportionately to the extent the relevant Liability was caused or contributed to by the actions (or inactions) of the other party...
The Netflix service and/or some of the Netflix content may not be available at any time as a result of events beyond our reasonable control...we will not be held liable should such events occur.
Monitoring
Miro has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Except for Excluded Claims, each party's (and its suppliers') entire liability arising out of or related to this Agreement will not exceed in aggregate the amounts paid or payable by Customer to Miro during the prior 12 months under this Agreement.— Excerpt from Miro's Miro Terms of Service
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The cap sets a hard ceiling on recoverable damages for either party, which directly limits the maximum financial remedy a Customer can obtain from Miro regardless of the severity of a breach.
If Miro causes harm, the most the Customer can recover is the amount the Customer paid or owed Miro in the 12 months before the claim, unless the claim falls within Excluded Claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Miro.