The agreement caps Jasper's total liability for any claims, including implied warranty claims, at the amount paid by the user for the service in the 12 months preceding the dispute.
This analysis describes what Jasper AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Jasper's liability exposure per claim, which affects the maximum recovery available to users regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm alleged.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of the liability cap for consumer claims may be constrained by applicable state or national consumer protection law; the document acknowledges this by limiting the cap to the extent permitted by applicable law.
Language softened with 'to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law' qualifier, suppliers and distributors added to liable parties, and separate damages waiver removed.
View full change record →Under this clause, the maximum amount recoverable from Jasper for any claim is limited to fees paid in the prior 12 months. Users on free tiers would have a liability cap at zero under this formula, subject to applicable law.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Pinterest shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, res...
You will remain responsible for any amounts you fail to pay in connection with your subscription, including collection costs, bank overdraft fees, collection agency fees, reasonable attorneys' fees, and arbitration or court costs.
Monitoring
Jasper AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, the total liability of Jasper, and its suppliers and distributors, for any claims under these terms, including for any implied warranties, is limited to the amount you paid us to use the services in the 12 months before the dispute.— Excerpt from Jasper AI's Jasper Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability caps in consumer service agreements engage applicable consumer protection law in multiple jurisdictions. EU consumer protection directives and UK Consumer Rights Act provisions may limit the enforceability of liability caps against consumers in those regions. California consumer protection law may also impose constraints on liability exclusions that result in a consumer recovering nothing. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. A 12-month fee cap is a standard commercial practice in SaaS agreements but may face enforceability challenges when applied to individual consumers, particularly for claims involving data loss, privacy breaches, or AI-generated content errors with consequential business impact. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users may have statutory rights that override contractual liability limitations for certain claim types. California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act and unfair competition law may limit the practical enforceability of this cap for California residents. The document notes the cap applies only to the extent permitted by applicable law, which preserves some jurisdictional flexibility but leaves scope uncertain. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers should negotiate liability caps in their master services agreements, as the consumer-facing 12-month cap may be inadequate for business-scale data or content processing losses. Vendor risk assessments should document the liability cap as a financial exposure factor. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams supporting enterprise deployments should confirm whether indemnification provisions and insurance requirements in enterprise agreements provide coverage beyond the standard 12-month liability cap stated in consumer terms.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Jasper's liability exposure per claim, which affects the maximum recovery available to users regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm alleged.
Under this clause, the maximum amount recoverable from Jasper for any claim is limited to fees paid in the prior 12 months. Users on free tiers would have a liability cap at zero under this formula, subject to applicable law.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 265 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Jasper AI.