This analysis describes what Instacart's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
This includes the use of automated, dynamic vetting and scoring analysis tools to identify and take action, as well as human review to supplement our automated abuse prevention.
Request a review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data.
We may (but are not obligated to) use automated systems and human reviewers to record, monitor, analyse, modify, disable and, store and review use of our Interactive Features...
"Clearly identifies itself as an automated system and does not misrepresent its nature, origin, or affiliation...Discloses that it is an agent and its name by including "Agent/[agent name]" in the user-agent string...Excerpt from Instacart's Terms of Service (Superseded Capture)
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Clearly identifies itself as an automated system and does not misrepresent its nature, origin, or affiliation...Discloses that it is an agent and its name by including "Agent/[agent name]" in the user-agent string...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 217 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Instacart.