HubSpot · HubSpot Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Forum Selection

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 3 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity HubSpot recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for HubSpot Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Any legal dispute with HubSpot must be resolved in courts located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, applying Massachusetts law, regardless of where your business is located.

This analysis describes what HubSpot's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

If you need to take legal action against HubSpot or defend a claim from HubSpot, you will generally need to do so in Massachusetts courts, which may create practical and financial barriers for businesses located in other states or countries.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of this forum selection clause varies significantly for EU, UK, and other international customers where mandatory local law may supersede contractual jurisdiction provisions, particularly for data protection claims.

Change history

modified Jun 17, 2026

Renamed to 'Governing Law and Dispute Resolution', expanded to jurisdiction-specific governing law with Massachusetts law as default for US/Canada/other, and Ireland law for EU/EEA/UK/Switzerland jurisdictions.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Non-Massachusetts businesses, and particularly international customers, may face significant logistical and cost burdens if a dispute with HubSpot requires litigation in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and local consumer or data protection law may not apply as expected.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

HubSpot has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. Any legal action or proceeding relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and each party consents to personal jurisdiction in such courts.

— Excerpt from HubSpot's HubSpot Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection and choice-of-law clauses are generally enforceable in US B2B commercial contracts under the Supreme Court's precedent in M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. and subsequent cases, though courts may decline to enforce them where they are unreasonable or unjust in context. In the EU, Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation may override contractual forum selection and choice-of-law clauses for certain categories of disputes, particularly those involving mandatory data protection law. GDPR disputes involving data subject rights may not be contractually displaced to Massachusetts courts. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. For US-based B2B customers, Massachusetts forum selection is a manageable limitation, though it increases litigation cost for non-Massachusetts businesses. For EU, UK, and other international customers, the clause creates heightened tension with local mandatory law and may be partially or wholly unenforceable for certain categories of claims, particularly data protection claims. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA customers should assess whether this forum selection clause is enforceable for GDPR-related claims, as EU supervisory authorities and data subjects typically cannot be contractually required to bring claims outside their home jurisdiction. UK customers face similar considerations under UK GDPR. Australian, Canadian, and other international customers should consult local counsel on the enforceability of US-exclusive forum selection for commercial disputes. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams negotiating enterprise agreements should assess whether alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as arbitration with agreed seat, or local jurisdiction carve-outs, are available for international customers. Legal teams should flag this clause when advising on the enforceability of HubSpot contract claims in non-US jurisdictions. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: International customers should confirm with local counsel whether this forum selection clause is enforceable in their jurisdiction and whether local mandatory law provisions such as GDPR supervisory authority jurisdiction or local consumer protection law may provide alternative forums or remedies that cannot be contractually waived.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State Attorneys General in the customer's home state may have authority over unfair or deceptive practices regardless of contractual forum selection clauses, providing an alternative enforcement avenue
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
HubSpot Terms of Service
Entity
HubSpot
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 9, 2026
Last verified
May 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-007716
Document ID
CA-D-00207
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
fe8ba7ca9a80e255f49bcc03fd3d4cf922c263ff1879581e19704a1350fb3524
Analysis generated
May 9, 2026 21:58 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: HubSpot
Document: HubSpot Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-007716
Captured: 2026-05-09 21:58:44 UTC
SHA-256: fe8ba7ca9a80e255…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/hubspot/hubspot-terms-of-service/governing-law-and-forum-selection/
Accessed: June 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does HubSpot's Governing Law and Forum Selection clause do?

If you need to take legal action against HubSpot or defend a claim from HubSpot, you will generally need to do so in Massachusetts courts, which may create practical and financial barriers for businesses located in other states or countries.

How does this clause affect you?

Non-Massachusetts businesses, and particularly international customers, may face significant logistical and cost burdens if a dispute with HubSpot requires litigation in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and local consumer or data protection law may not apply as expected.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 3 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with HubSpot?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by HubSpot.