This analysis describes what Harvey AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
This provision does not require you to indemnify any of the Company Parties for any unconscionable commercial practice by such party or for such party's fraud, deception, false promise, misrepresentation...
This provision does not include claims resulting from the Released Parties' willful misconduct and/or gross negligence.
Twilio will have no liability or obligation under this Section 6.1 with respect to any Twilio Indemnifiable Claim arising out of...(c) Services for which there is no charge or Beta Offerings.
"Harvey does not have any obligation to defend or indemnify with respect to Output that results from Input or Customer Data that is in violation of our Terms or results from Input or Customer Data that You knew or reasonably should have known was likely to lead to infringing Output.Excerpt from Harvey AI's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Harvey does not have any obligation to defend or indemnify with respect to Output that results from Input or Customer Data that is in violation of our Terms or results from Input or Customer Data that You knew or reasonably should have known was likely to lead to infringing Output.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 229 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Harvey AI.