This analysis describes what DoorDash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.
For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions
"this Agreement is governed by the laws of: (i) for United States Orders, the State of Delaware consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act; (ii) for Canada Orders...the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein; (iii) for Australia Orders, the State of Victoria, AustraliaExcerpt from DoorDash's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “this Agreement is governed by the laws of: (i) for United States Orders, the State of Delaware consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act; (ii) for Canada Orders...the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein; (iii) for Australia Orders, the State of Victoria, Australia”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DoorDash.