This analysis describes what DoorDash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.
you consent as part of these Terms to venue for such cases exclusively in these courts.
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws rules, and the proper venue for any disputes arising out of or relating to any of the same will be the arbitration venue set forth in Section 9, or if arbitration does not apply, then the state and fe...
"both you and DoorDash agree that all claims and disputes arising out of or relating to the Agreement will be litigated exclusively in the Superior Court of Justice or Federal Court of Canada residing in Toronto, Ontario.Excerpt from DoorDash's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “both you and DoorDash agree that all claims and disputes arising out of or relating to the Agreement will be litigated exclusively in the Superior Court of Justice or Federal Court of Canada residing in Toronto, Ontario.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DoorDash.