Cohere owns its AI models, platform, and technology. You own the data you submit to the API, but Cohere owns the underlying models and services.
This analysis describes what Cohere's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The agreement establishes that outputs generated by Cohere's models may not automatically carry full intellectual property protections in all jurisdictions, and enterprise customers building products on top of API outputs should be aware of the ownership structure the agreement asserts.
Interpretive note: The legal status of AI-generated output ownership varies significantly by jurisdiction and is subject to ongoing regulatory and judicial development; the agreement's IP clause does not resolve this underlying uncertainty.
The terms state that Cohere retains ownership of its models and the Services, while customer data remains customer property; however, the ownership of AI-generated outputs is a legally complex area that the agreement addresses only partially, and applicable law in various jurisdictions may affect what rights customers can assert over generated content.
How other platforms handle this
As between you and Jasper, you own your Inputs and, subject to your compliance with these Terms, Jasper assigns to you all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Outputs. Jasper does not warrant that the Outputs will be original, that your use of the Outputs will not infringe the rights of ...
The Software and all intellectual property rights therein are and shall remain the property of NVIDIA or its licensors. You acknowledge that no title to the intellectual property in the Software is transferred to you. You may not reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, or otherwise attempt to deri...
The Services and their entire contents, features, and functionality (including but not limited to all information, software, text, displays, images, video, and audio, and the design, selection, and arrangement thereof) are owned by Writer, its licensors, or other providers of such material and are p...
Monitoring
Cohere has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"As between Customer and Cohere, Cohere retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Services, including all intellectual property rights therein. Customer retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Customer Data.— Excerpt from Cohere's Cohere SaaS Agreement
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Copyright ownership of AI-generated outputs is an evolving legal area in the US (US Copyright Office guidance indicates AI-generated content without sufficient human authorship may not be copyrightable), the EU (EU AI Act and Copyright Directive interact with this question), and other jurisdictions. No single regulatory authority has issued definitive guidance applicable globally. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Enterprise customers building commercial products that incorporate AI-generated outputs should seek legal guidance on the copyright status of those outputs in their primary operating jurisdictions, as the agreement's IP ownership structure does not resolve the underlying legal uncertainty about output ownership. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: US, EU, and UK customers face different legal frameworks regarding AI-generated content ownership. The US Copyright Office has indicated that purely AI-generated content may not be protected; EU member states are working through implementation of relevant directives. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should confirm that the agreement's IP provisions adequately protect the customer's rights to use, modify, and commercialize outputs for their intended use case. The non-transferable license structure means IP rights in the platform cannot be acquired by customers. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should document the IP ownership structure and obtain legal advice on the copyright status of AI-generated outputs in jurisdictions where the customer plans to commercialize content derived from Cohere's API.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Buried in Robinhood's customer agreement is broad authority to close your positions, suspend your account, and force arbitration. Here is what it actually says.
Stripe's terms authorize fund reserves, payout withholding, and account termination. Here is what the agreement states and what business owners should review.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The agreement establishes that outputs generated by Cohere's models may not automatically carry full intellectual property protections in all jurisdictions, and enterprise customers building products on top of API outputs should be aware of the ownership structure the agreement asserts.
The terms state that Cohere retains ownership of its models and the Services, while customer data remains customer property; however, the ownership of AI-generated outputs is a legally complex area that the agreement addresses only partially, and applicable law in various jurisdictions may affect what rights customers can assert over generated content.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 27 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cohere.