This analysis describes what Chegg's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users cannot pool claims with others, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value disputes and removes the collective leverage of class litigation.
The updated terms establish a carve-out from mandatory arbitration for sexual assault and sexual harassment claims, allowing those disputes to proceed outside arbitration. The revised geographic restrictions now apply to all services rather than textbook rentals alone, and users must certify upon registration that they are not on US restricted-persons lists and comply with US export laws. For users of AI-Assisted Features, the terms clarify that inputs remain subject to Chegg's content license and training use rights, and explicitly state that personal or confidential information submitted despite warnings will be handled per the Privacy Policy but remains subject to these licensing terms. You can review the full updated terms and, if you have concerns about arbitration, determine whether the sexual assault and harassment carve-out applies to your situation.
View change record →You cannot bring or participate in any class, collective, or mass action against Chegg; any dispute you have must be pursued individually.
How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
"you and Chegg agree to waive the right to have any Dispute...be brought, heard, administered, resolved, or arbitrated on a class, collective, or mass action basis...all disputes...must be arbitrated on an individual basis...Excerpt from Chegg's Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Users cannot pool claims with others, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value disputes and removes the collective leverage of class litigation.
You cannot bring or participate in any class, collective, or mass action against Chegg; any dispute you have must be pursued individually.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Chegg.