If you have a legal dispute with Calm, you generally cannot sue them in court or join a class action lawsuit; instead, you must go through individual arbitration, which is a private process with a single arbitrator.
This analysis describes what Calm's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision removes your ability to participate in class action lawsuits, which are often the only practical mechanism for consumers to pursue small individual claims collectively when the cost of individual litigation would exceed any potential recovery.
Interpretive note: The full text of section 16 was truncated in the provided document; the complete opt-out procedure, deadline, and arbitration administrator are not fully visible, creating uncertainty about specific procedural requirements.
Users who experience a problem with Calm, such as an unauthorized charge or service failure, are required to resolve it through individual arbitration rather than court, and cannot join with other affected users in a class action, which may make pursuing small claims economically impractical.
How other platforms handle this
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof, including the determination of the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be determined by arbitration before one arbitrat...
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Monitoring
Calm has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY BECAUSE, UNLESS YOU OPT OUT, IT REQUIRES YOU AND CALM TO ARBITRATE CERTAIN DISPUTES AND CLAIMS AND LIMITS THE MANNER IN WHICH WE CAN SEEK RELIEF FROM EACH OTHER. ARBITRATION PRECLUDES YOU AND CALM FROM SUING IN COURT. YOU AND CALM AGREE THAT ARBITRATION WILL BE SOLELY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NO... By agreeing to these Terms, you and Calm will, as described in section 16 below, be required to resolve most disputes with each other solely on an individual basis through arbitration where permitted by applicable law and not with a jury trial or as a class arbitration, class action, or any other kind of representative or court proceeding.— Excerpt from Calm's Calm Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Mandatory arbitration clauses and class action waivers in consumer contracts are subject to scrutiny under the FTC Act as potential unfair or deceptive practices, and have been the subject of CFPB rulemaking activity in financial services contexts. In the EU and UK, such clauses are generally unenforceable in consumer contracts under unfair contract terms directives, which is relevant given that Calm maintains a separate terms set for EEA and UK users. State attorneys general in jurisdictions such as California and New York have authority to challenge arbitration provisions that are procedurally or substantively unconscionable under state contract law. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium-High. Mandatory arbitration provisions in consumer-facing wellness app terms are common in the US technology sector, but the breadth of the class action waiver combined with the US$50 liability cap creates a combined effect that substantially limits practical user recourse. The opt-out mechanism (referenced but truncated in the provided document) is a partial mitigation, but its deadline and method are not fully visible in the provided text. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EEA and UK users are subject to a separate terms set and this provision likely does not apply to them. California courts have periodically found arbitration clauses unconscionable where combined with liability caps and asymmetric remedies. Illinois and other states may impose additional limits on enforceability depending on how the clause is presented at sign-up. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise or health plan partners integrating Calm access for their employees or members should assess whether this arbitration clause affects their own dispute resolution obligations or indemnification arrangements. The clause asserts that Calm retains control of the defense or settlement of third-party claims under section 14, which is a related governance consideration. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should verify that the opt-out mechanism, deadline, and method are clearly disclosed at the point of account creation and subscription purchase. The opt-out window and instructions should be audited against applicable state electronic notice and consumer protection requirements. If the full text of section 16 was modified in a recent update, affected existing users should have received compliant advance notice.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision removes your ability to participate in class action lawsuits, which are often the only practical mechanism for consumers to pursue small individual claims collectively when the cost of individual litigation would exceed any potential recovery.
Users who experience a problem with Calm, such as an unauthorized charge or service failure, are required to resolve it through individual arbitration rather than court, and cannot join with other affected users in a class action, which may make pursuing small claims economically impractical.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 26 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calm.