This analysis describes what Calendly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive law applies to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement. The exclusive forum selection establishes the procedural venue for litigation, requiring parties to litigate disputes in a specific geographic location rather than courts in other jurisdictions.
Users are bound by Georgia law in disputes arising from the Terms, and any non-arbitrable legal claims must be brought in Fulton County courts rather than courts in the user's own state or jurisdiction. This establishes both the substantive legal framework and the specific courts with jurisdiction over such disputes.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...
These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Monitoring
Calendly has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"These Terms will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Any legal action or proceeding arising under these Terms that is not subject to the arbitration clause will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in Fulton County, Georgia, and the parties irrevocably consent to personal jurisdiction and venue there.— Excerpt from Calendly's Calendly Terms of Use
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive law applies to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement. The exclusive forum selection establishes the procedural venue for litigation, requiring parties to litigate disputes in a specific geographic location rather than courts in other jurisdictions.
Users are bound by Georgia law in disputes arising from the Terms, and any non-arbitrable legal claims must be brought in Fulton County courts rather than courts in the user's own state or jurisdiction. This establishes both the substantive legal framework and the specific courts with jurisdiction over such disputes.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 202 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calendly.