This analysis describes what AT&T's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause establishes arbitration as the mandatory dispute resolution mechanism for service-related claims, which affects how contractual disputes between AT&T and users are adjudicated and limits access to jury trials and class action proceedings.
Users are required to pursue disputes through binding arbitration rather than court proceedings, except for small claims court actions that qualify under applicable law. The terms apply as written upon continued use of AT&T services.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Monitoring
AT&T has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Any dispute or claim relating in any way to your use of AT&T's services or to any products or services sold or distributed by AT&T will be resolved by binding arbitration, rather than in court, except that you may assert claims in small claims court if your claims qualify.— Excerpt from AT&T's AT&T Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause establishes arbitration as the mandatory dispute resolution mechanism for service-related claims, which affects how contractual disputes between AT&T and users are adjudicated and limits access to jury trials and class action proceedings.
Users are required to pursue disputes through binding arbitration rather than court proceedings, except for small claims court actions that qualify under applicable law. The terms apply as written upon continued use of AT&T services.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 10 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AT&T.